PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EWA vs. ^N225
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EWA and ^N225 is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

EWA vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
680.83%
29.06%
EWA
^N225

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EWA:

0.60

^N225:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

EWA:

0.93

^N225:

0.86

Omega Ratio

EWA:

1.11

^N225:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

EWA:

0.92

^N225:

0.54

Martin Ratio

EWA:

2.45

^N225:

1.89

Ulcer Index

EWA:

4.06%

^N225:

7.35%

Daily Std Dev

EWA:

16.49%

^N225:

26.02%

Max Drawdown

EWA:

-66.98%

^N225:

-81.87%

Current Drawdown

EWA:

-9.08%

^N225:

-8.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than ^N225's -3.62% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has underperformed ^N225 with an annualized return of 5.34%, while ^N225 has yielded a comparatively higher 8.47% annualized return.


EWA

YTD

1.59%

1M

1.72%

6M

-1.21%

1Y

7.92%

5Y*

4.66%

10Y*

5.34%

^N225

YTD

-3.62%

1M

-0.93%

6M

-4.02%

1Y

6.92%

5Y*

10.06%

10Y*

8.47%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EWA vs. ^N225 — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EWA is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EWA is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EWA is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EWA is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EWA is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EWA is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

^N225
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^N225 is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^N225 is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^N225 is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^N225 is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^N225 is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^N225 is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EWA vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EWA, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.340.01
The chart of Sortino ratio for EWA, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.580.21
The chart of Omega ratio for EWA, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.071.03
The chart of Calmar ratio for EWA, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.510.01
The chart of Martin ratio for EWA, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.340.05
EWA
^N225

The current EWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the ^N225 Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWA and ^N225, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.34
0.01
EWA
^N225

Drawdowns

EWA vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, smaller than the maximum ^N225 drawdown of -81.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and ^N225. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.08%
-14.49%
EWA
^N225

Volatility

EWA vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) is 3.90%, while Nikkei 225 (^N225) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that EWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^N225 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.90%
6.30%
EWA
^N225
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab