EWA vs. ^N225
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Nikkei 225 (^N225).
EWA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 1996.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWA or ^N225.
Correlation
The correlation between EWA and ^N225 is -0.60. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
EWA vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
EWA:
9.38%
^N225:
29.98%
EWA:
-0.88%
^N225:
-81.87%
EWA:
-0.16%
^N225:
-10.87%
Returns By Period
EWA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
^N225
-5.67%
12.05%
-4.73%
-1.56%
13.50%
6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWA vs. ^N225 — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EWA
^N225
EWA vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Drawdowns
EWA vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -0.88%, smaller than the maximum ^N225 drawdown of -81.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and ^N225. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
EWA vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...