EWA vs. ^N225
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Nikkei 225 (^N225).
EWA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 1996.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWA or ^N225.
Key characteristics
| EWA | ^N225 | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.19% | 8.75% |
| 1Y Return | 20.11% | 10.31% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.16% | 6.87% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.68% | 11.72% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.97% | 8.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.12 | 0.51 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.49% | 25.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.98% | -81.87% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.57% | -13.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWA and ^N225 is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EWA vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than ^N225's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has underperformed ^N225 with an annualized return of 3.97%, while ^N225 has yielded a comparatively higher 8.89% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWA vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
EWA vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, smaller than the maximum ^N225 drawdown of -81.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and ^N225. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWA vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) is 4.94%, while Nikkei 225 (^N225) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that EWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^N225 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.